I wonder…….
According to Rabbi Darfour: “Charles Darwin’s Origin of the Species threatened a religious community that up to that point in history had only its own faith to shape it. The tools of biblical criticism, archeology, and modern day cosmology were not yet available to biblical scholars, theologians, and religious historians”

“Now they are, and because they are, science and religion no longer need to repudiate each other to justify themselves”
“Indeed, they can complement each other. The science of the cosmos can indeed strengthen, if not confirm the faith of the believer.”
“For such a person, the heavens do show the glory of God. Cosmology need not destroy that belief.”

According to Dr Christine Page: “It was not until the Lemurian Age …some 100,000 years ago, that separation occurred into two genders and the principle of duality began.” I would think that the Adam and Eve story of the Bible occurred not earlier than the :separation into two genders” There could not have been a male and a female earlier.

In the context of human evolution according to Dr Page: “the physical body would have looked almost transparent as its energy was still of a high frequency allowing easy exchange of light consciousness and thought between people, the Nature Kingdoms and those of the spirit world.”

Reading Dr Page, Neale Walsch and listening to the spiritual leaders of Hawaii as interviewed by Lilou Mace in Juicy Living Tours as well as listening to the interviews of Wayne Dyer and Barbara Marx Hubbard make me wonder how my church till now has not come up with an updated interpretation of Original Sin.In a previous essay I wrote that Original Sin could very well be the programmed memories as explained in Joe Vitale’s “Zero Limits”. I can only wonder because not even my 24 units of Theology in college, a long time ago, have adequately equipped me to give a substantial discussion of such a sacred teaching.